Fuck The Fed

The real Titanic didn’t sink. The Titanic was replaced with the Olympic ship. They called the Olympic the Titanic. The Olympic ship did not work properly, the steering was messed up, so the smart ass illuminati or whatever you want to call them, the “elite”, invited all the rich bankers who wanted to change the banking system for the better, to the Olympic. The elite knew it was going to crash which was perfect for them because it would kill everyone that was a threat. Sick bastards

In 1898 a struggling author named Morgan Robertson concocted a novel called “Futility” about a fabulous Atlantic liner, far larger than any that had been built.

No more than fourteen years later a British shipping company named the White Star Line built a steamer remarkably like the one in Robertson’s novel.

• The new liner was 66,000 tons displacement; Robertson’s was 70,000 tons.
• The real ship was 882ft and 9in long; the fictional one was 800ft.
• Both vessels were triple screw and could make 24 – 25 knots.
• Both could carry about 3,000 people and both had enough lifeboats for only a fraction of this number. But, then, this didn’t seem to matter because they were both labeled “unsinkable”.
• The fictional boat was wrecked one cold April night on an iceberg.  On April 10, 1912 the real ship left Southampton on her maiden voyage to New York.  On her way over she too struck an iceberg and went down.
• Robertson called his ship the Titan; the White Star Line called its ship the Titanic.

Necessary to their plans, the Federal Reserve did have some opposition; those who saw what the future would become if banking was outside of the government’s hands, the rates set by a private company such as the Fed. All the wealthy and powerful men the Jesuits wanted to get rid of were invited to take the cruise. Three of the richest and most important of these were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isador Strauss, the head of Macy’s Department Stores, and John Jacob Astor, probably the wealthiest man in the world. Their total wealth, at that time, using dollar values of their day was more than 500 million dollars. Today that amount of money would be worth nearly eleven billion dollars. These three men were coaxed and encouraged to board the floating palace. They had to be destroyed because the Jesuits knew they would use their wealth and influence to oppose a Federal Reserve Bank as well as the various wars that were being planned.

“The surviving crew were detained overnight and forced to sign a pledge under the  ‘Official Secrets Act’, promising to keep secret forever, the actual events of the night of 14th / 15th April, 1912″

The Captain of Titanic, Edward Smith (left) had been traversing the North Atlantic waters for more than a quarter of a century.  He was regarded as the ‘world’s most experienced master’ in the North Atlantic but Smith knew all along that his ship would be made to sink on its ‘first’ voyage.

He also had complete knowledge of where the icebergs were.  Under his boss J.P. Morgan’s secret orders, he propelled Titanic full speed at 22 knots on a moonless night and through a ice field 80 square miles in size.

Captain Smith’s actions were totally out of character.  Significantly and conveniently, Smith in the age-old tradition, as Captain, went down with the ship.  Could Smith have even been ‘allowed’ to survive, knowing as he did, the real truth about the incident?

As is well known, there were not enough lifeboats for all passengers and crew. Some boats left the ship as little as only one quarter full.  The Captain strangely ordered white flares knowing full well that the international standard for distress flares was red.  Other ships passing within sight of these flares were intentionally confused and thought the Titanic was having a fireworks party.

In his book, “Titanic, the Ship that Didn’t Sink,” Robin Gardner states, “As I delved deeper into the story, more and more inconsistencies became apparent.  Inconsistencies that individually meant little but collectively pointed to a grimmer reality than that usually depicted in the heroic legend”.

He continues, “Officers who were later acclaimed as heroes were exposed as anything but.  One in particular removed a little boy from a lifeboat at gunpoint, before escaping in that same boat himself”.

“Descriptions of the collision and damage supposedly sustained by Titanic do not agree.  The ‘slight scrape’ with the ice that was hardly noticed by most aboard contradicts solid evidence of structural damage at least 5½ feet (1.6 meters) within the outer hull of the vessel”.

“Then came evidence to show that the ice the ship encountered was seen first not 500 yards (480 meters) ahead but more like 11 miles (17km).  I began to wonder if perhaps the sinking of the Titanic might not have been an accident after all”.

Indeed, did Titanic actually strike an iceberg at all?  We only have the testimony of four people believe it or not with which to confirm or deny this fact.  First Officer Murdoch would have been the fifth witness but he did not live to tell his story.

The Titanic was not the only ship at that precise location that night.  For example, there is a photograph of a drifting lifeboat sporting the colors of a different ship than the Titanic.

Then there is the gouge in the side of the ship itself – 1.6 meters deep through the outer steel plates and into the inner skin!  Compacted ice is known to be very strong, but it is not capable of doing such damage to steel.

INQUIRIES

Both the American and British official inquiries were considered ‘whitewashes’, with much evidence ignored and eye-witness testimonies being twisted or indeed fabricated to fit the ‘official’ story.

Of the 102 witnesses called to the British Inquiry, only two were passengers. None of the witnesses (crew or passengers) were allowed to offer first-hand evidence of any kind and were strictly restricted to the simple answering of questions without elaboration.  By any standards at all, this sounds very much like a ‘whitewash’ to me.

A ‘yellow-funneled steamer’ observed in the proximity of Titanic by the officers and crew of the Californian at around the time of the incident. This ship has never been identified.

“…I saw another steamer approaching, and asked [the wireless operator] what vessels he had within reach; he replied: ‘The Titanic’, whereupon I replied, ‘That is not the Titanic; she is too small and hasn’t enough lights.’
Shortly afterwards this steamer stopped and was bearing S.S.E. about five or six miles from our position.  …the chief officer was sweeping the southern horizon with his glasses, and finally reported he saw a four-mast steamer with a yellow funnel to the southward of us, and asked if we should try to get down to have a look at her.”  Captain Lord of the Californian in an interview with an American newspaper reporter in 1914.

The crew of this ship (whatever she was) must have been aware that they were close to the Titanic, so why did no-one volunteer any information?

Could this mysterious yellow-funneled vessel have been responsible for the devastating damage to Titanic?  The ‘iceberg collision’ is just a cover story concocted to protect the guilty.

Furthermore, upon arriving back in England, from New York aboard the steamer Lapland, two weeks after the disaster, 173 of the surviving crew me denied their right to speak with their trade union representatives.

They were also detained and forced to sign a pledge under the  ‘Official Secrets Act’, promising to keep secret forever, the actual events of the night of 14th / 15th April.

Otherwise, they would be prosecuted and ‘never work again’, not just for White Star but for any other employer.  In those now far-off days, the inability to procure gainful employment could be almost a death sentence to the crews and their families.

CONCLUSION

Did Captain Smith deliberately steer Titanic into a huge ice-field without reducing speed to create a cover-story for the Titanic to be rammed by the yellow-funneled mystery ship?

Along with the officer on duty on the Bridge at that time, First Officer William Murdoch and Quartermaster Hitchens plus Quartermaster George Rowe on the after-bridge, lookouts Frederick Fleet and Reginald Lee were the only other ones known to have personally witnessed the appalling events.

Of these five witnesses, four survived, significantly all of them ‘lower-class’ people. Forcing four working-class people to keep quiet over a century ago, would have been a relatively simple task.

First Officer Murdoch is said to have ‘committed suicide’ in the aftermath of the collision whilst the ship was being abandoned. He has also been accused of shooting passengers before turning a gun on himself, something that his family and descendants have disputed. Could there be a more sinister explanation for his demise along with that of Captain Smith?

Down the years, suicide has always been a very convenient cover-story for many a silencing murder. How easy would it have been under the circumstances for a paid assassin to dispose of Messrs Smith, Murdoch, as well as the financiers Guggenheim, Strauss and Astor?

Thus, these wealthy men, who may have opposed the formation of the Federal Reserve System (granted, due to their own conflicting financial interests and not out of any great concern for the plight of the masses), were disposed of, along with the ‘collateral damage’ of 1517 other innocents.

William Thomas Stead was one of the most controversial figures of his age. Journalist, editor, pacifist and spiritualist, he was an important contributor to the evolution of today’s popular journalism and his death on the ill-fated Titanic continues to generate fascination and debate..

Delve deeper into this academically applauded website and discover more about this extraordinary man, whose many social and political campaigns had far reaching effects that remain with us today.

In 1908, financier J.P. Morgan planned a brand new class of luxury liners that would enable the wealthy to cross the Atlantic in previously undreamed-of opulence.  The construction of the giant vessels, the ’Olympic’, the ’Titanic’ and the ’Britannic,’ began in 1909 at the Harland and Wolff  shipyard in Belfast, Ireland.

Unfortunately for Morgan, this money-making venture went a little awry.  The Olympic, the first of the three sister-ships to be completed was involved in a serious collision with the British Royal Navy cruiser,HMS Hawke in September 1911 in Southampton a few weeks after its maiden voyage. It had to be  ‘patched-up’ before returning to Belfast to undergo proper repair work.

In hindsight, it does seem strange that the Olympic, the first of the ‘sisters’ to enter service, was never given the publicity her younger sister, the Titanic, enjoyed the following year  Why would that be?

In the meantime, a Royal Navy inquiry into the accident found the Olympic at fault for the collision and this meant that the owner, White Star Line’s insurance was null and void.  The White Star Line was out of pocket to the tune of at least £800,000 (around $90m today) for repairs and lost revenues.

However, for Morgan and the White Star Line, there was even worse news.
It is believed that the keel of the ship was actually twisted and therefore  beyond repair, which would have effectively meant the scrapyard. The White Star Line would have been bankrupted, given its precarious financial situation..

According to Robin Gardner’s book, ’Titanic, the Ship that Never Sank?’
the seeds were sown for an audacious insurance scam – the surreptitious switching of the identities of the two ships, Olympic and Titanic.

Gardner presents credible testimonies, indisputable facts and evidence, both written and photographic, that suggest that the two ships were indeed switched with a view to staging an iceberg collision or other unknown fatal event.

According to Gardner, “Almost two months after the Hawke/Olympic collision, the reconverted Titanic, now superficially identical to her sister except for the C deck portholes, quietly left Belfast for Southampton to begin a very successful 25-year career as the Olympic.

Back in the builders’ yard, work progressed steadily on transforming the battered hulk of the Olympicinto the Titanic.  The decision to dispose of the damaged vessel would already have been taken. …  Instead of replacing the damaged section of keel, longitudinal bulkheads were installed to brace it”.

How significant then in the light of this statement, that when the wreck of the Titanic was first investigated by Robert Ballard and his crew after its discovery in 1987, the first explorations of the wreckage reportedly showed (completely undocumented in the ships original blueprints) iron support structures in place which appeared to be supporting and bracing the keel.

This was never satisfactorily explained but would certainly be significant as it was reported by the puzzled Ballard himself who of course at that time knew nothing (and probably still does not even now) about the alleged switching of the two ships’ identities.